Thursday, February 7, 2008

HORRIBLE!!! I will not count these two sorry excuses for a cigar towards my two a month limit. I only lit the Torano and smoked only an inch and a half of the Cuban House Blend. Regardless, I will give their review just in case I got a "bad" stick. Please comment if you feel otherwise.

The Carlos Torano 1916, I have heard, are a wonderful smoke. They are wrapped with an African leaf, and filled with Honduran fillers. I prepared my palate for a smooth, medium-bodied smoke, with that noticeable taste only a Cameroon leaf can give, but only experienced a dry, uneven burning, very bittery, and even ashy taste. I usually pair my cigars with a strong coffee, and even that did not help my experience with the Torano blend. To their credit, I will concede that perhaps mine was dried, or that it was a bad cigar. Unfortunately it will be a long while before I try them again. But I will. If you look at the picture, you can see a very dark grey smoke coming from the cigar. Not good.

Cigar.com, like many other cigar retailers, market their own "House Blend/Private Stock." They typically do not make it themselves, but make deals with factories in Nicaragua, the Dominican, and Honduras etc. to manufacture extra cigars that they inturn add their label to. Many of these cigars you will find are similar to big name brand cigars such as Pragtas, Macunudo, etc. because they are made from the same factories, same rollers, and even same tobacco. Yet I think that the secret is they use the lesser grade tobacco or tobacco that did not make the cut for whatever reason. As was the case with this Cuban House Blend. I recall an interview I saw with Jorge and Orlando Padron. They mentioned that the term "spicy" was never a good thing with describing cigars. I would agree. Cigar.com markets this Cuban blend made from Domincan tobbacos as "spicy." Again, I agree under the Padron's understanding of the term. I may try this again in the distant future to confirm.

0 comments: